Good time to negotiate a new contract.
MVP: Baker Mayfield
- Central_Buc
- Posts: 3041
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2021 5:50 am
- Reputation: 886
Re: MVP: Baker Mayfield
You should consider coming over to the dark side
Which ive been meaning to ask...has there been any in Cleveland converting to TB or wearing Tampa Baker Jerseys?
Re: MVP: Baker Mayfield
Central_Buc wrote: ↑Sat Nov 08, 2025 8:36 amYou should consider coming over to the dark side![]()
Which ive been meaning to ask...has there been any in Cleveland converting to TB or wearing Tampa Baker Jerseys?
Occasionally, you see Mayfield jerseys…. But that’s about it.
I do like the Bucs… I could just never give up on my browns!!
- Central_Buc
- Posts: 3041
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2021 5:50 am
- Reputation: 886
Re: MVP: Baker Mayfield
He'll back in the convo if a win tomorrow and he at least out performs Allen in Buffalo
Edit: meaning Mvp.
Re: MVP: Baker Mayfield
Maybe next year
Re: MVP: Baker Mayfield
If he had completed that comeback today he’d be back in the lead. Bummer.
- BucsNBills
- Posts: 3787
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2022 1:50 pm
- Reputation: 1213
Re: MVP: Baker Mayfield
Yeah, any chance of winning MVP is now over. Probably for the best though, because IMO we don't need to extend Baker this off-season. Let him play out next year and earn another contract. Right now he's not playing like a QB I want to invest any more money into.
We're paying the price for a half-measure taken by The Union 160 years ago.
The New Union will correct that mistake.
The New Union will correct that mistake.
Re: MVP: Baker Mayfield
I would not go that far. But he certainly isn't playing like a guy that needs to be on that 50-55Mil range. Now worse QBs than Baker are being paid that money, but that should not justify Baker being paid that much.BucsNBills wrote: ↑Sun Nov 09, 2025 5:11 pm Yeah, any chance of winning MVP is now over. Probably for the best though, because IMO we don't need to extend Baker this off-season. Let him play out next year and earn another contract. Right now he's not playing like a QB I want to invest any more money into.
-
Onthebrink
- Posts: 1029
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2022 4:16 pm
- Reputation: 246
Re: MVP: Baker Mayfield
Even if he did come back against the Pats he wouldn't be close to the lead. Mathew Stafford should be at this point or Jonathon Taylor.
Re: MVP: Baker Mayfield
Baker will no longer be considered for MVP.
- Selmon Rules
- Posts: 3023
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 7:02 pm
- Reputation: 1200
-
Grahamburn
- Posts: 9034
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
- Reputation: 3427
Re: MVP: Baker Mayfield
Yeah he gave up four plays of over 70+ yards today.BucsNBills wrote: ↑Sun Nov 09, 2025 5:11 pm Yeah, any chance of winning MVP is now over. Probably for the best though, because IMO we don't need to extend Baker this off-season. Let him play out next year and earn another contract. Right now he's not playing like a QB I want to invest any more money into.
Re: MVP: Baker Mayfield
I don't care much about individual awards. Baker winning MVP is a distraction of the real goal, which is winning a Superbowl.
Baker is playing well, as well as can be expected given the injuries on offense to his weapons and the men who protect him. I hope he continues to do so.
Baker is playing well, as well as can be expected given the injuries on offense to his weapons and the men who protect him. I hope he continues to do so.

-
Onthebrink
- Posts: 1029
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2022 4:16 pm
- Reputation: 246
Re: MVP: Baker Mayfield
Define the word well. I know that most of you are not versed in even basic vocabulary but I would like to know. Adequate? Now we are getting into subjective opinions. As well as you expect. Some of us expect more from a QB that makes 100 million dollars. When he was making 5 on a prove it contract absolutely. A lot of us expect more. You went into a thread about Baker winning MVP and then said "I don't care about the subject of the thread. It is a distraction." Not when it first appeared but 8 weeks later. It would be like going into a GDT and saying "this game doesn't matter. The only thing that matters is the Super Bowl." This team has ZERO chance of a Super Bowl just like the last two seasons. Admit it.Cheb wrote: ↑Sun Nov 09, 2025 8:25 pm I don't care much about individual awards. Baker winning MVP is a distraction of the real goal, which is winning a Superbowl.
Baker is playing well, as well as can be expected given the injuries on offense to his weapons and the men who protect him. I hope he continues to do so.
Re: MVP: Baker Mayfield
I won't say this team has zero chance, but it will take a few perfect games and a few lucky bounces.Onthebrink wrote: ↑Sun Nov 09, 2025 9:49 pmDefine the word well. I know that most of you are not versed in even basic vocabulary but I would like to know. Adequate? Now we are getting into subjective opinions. As well as you expect. Some of us expect more from a QB that makes 100 million dollars. When he was making 5 on a prove it contract absolutely. A lot of us expect more. You went into a thread about Baker winning MVP and then said "I don't care about the subject of the thread. It is a distraction." Not when it first appeared but 8 weeks later. It would be like going into a GDT and saying "this game doesn't matter. The only thing that matters is the Super Bowl." This team has ZERO chance of a Super Bowl just like the last two seasons. Admit it.Cheb wrote: ↑Sun Nov 09, 2025 8:25 pm I don't care much about individual awards. Baker winning MVP is a distraction of the real goal, which is winning a Superbowl.
Baker is playing well, as well as can be expected given the injuries on offense to his weapons and the men who protect him. I hope he continues to do so.
Re: MVP: Baker Mayfield
Bakers MVP went out the window against the Lions.
Re: MVP: Baker Mayfield
Mike Evans, Chris Godwin, and Jalen McMillan accounted for 2000 receiving yards and 24 touchdowns last season. Bucky Irving had 1500 scrimmage yards and 8 touchdowns. Those men are not on the field helping win games, they have spent the majority of their seasons on the trainer's table.Onthebrink wrote: ↑Sun Nov 09, 2025 9:49 pmDefine the word well. I know that most of you are not versed in even basic vocabulary but I would like to know. Adequate? Now we are getting into subjective opinions. As well as you expect. Some of us expect more from a QB that makes 100 million dollars. When he was making 5 on a prove it contract absolutely. A lot of us expect more. You went into a thread about Baker winning MVP and then said "I don't care about the subject of the thread. It is a distraction." Not when it first appeared but 8 weeks later. It would be like going into a GDT and saying "this game doesn't matter. The only thing that matters is the Super Bowl." This team has ZERO chance of a Super Bowl just like the last two seasons. Admit it.Cheb wrote: ↑Sun Nov 09, 2025 8:25 pm I don't care much about individual awards. Baker winning MVP is a distraction of the real goal, which is winning a Superbowl.
Baker is playing well, as well as can be expected given the injuries on offense to his weapons and the men who protect him. I hope he continues to do so.
Baker Mayfield's current top three receivers are two rookies and a NFL journeyman. His offensive line has been patchwork all year. He's on his third offensive coordinator in three seasons, having lifted the prior two to head coaching jobs. His running game has once more regressed into a bottom 10 NFL unit.
And yet, despite all that, we still have not only a winning record, but we have a lead in our division and the current #4 seed in the playoffs. And who is the guy who has accounted for 72% of our offensive touchdowns, without whose late-game heroics earlier in the season we would be talking about draft position right now? Baker Mayfield.
So yeah. He's playing adequate, as you put it. Well, as I put it. Not perfect, but given all the handicaps we've had offensively, I think he's playing solid ball.
If you have difficulty comprehending the audacity of subjective descriptors of play, then I suggest you pick another sport to watch...but wait, all sports are filled with subjective descriptors of performance. Maybe read a book...nope, too subjective. Make love...nope, again subjective. Maybe just eat saltines and stare at a wall, or frown into a calculator, or masturbate to the ridiculous and inherently false proposition that there's anything close to objective truth, when as we all know that even ideas formerly thought of as objective truth such as the speed of light (which has been in fact been proven to not be a constant) are not constant, ignoring the truth that you yourself are an inherently subjective being in a world wherein meaning is only described by and won by subjective beings in an inherently subjective universe.
If you cling to objectivity, cling to this; the goal of any a team sport is team accomplishment, and individual awards are laurels collected along the way. I have believed this for decades and I'll believe it when I'm in the cold ground. I didn't say it before to not be a negative Nancy; I say it now to remind us to keep our eyes on the prize, which is a Lombardi.
Speaking of, as far as this team's chance at a Superbowl, the #4 seed Rams won a ring just a few years ago. So, will all due respect, take your doomsinging and stuff it.


