real bucs fan wrote: ↑Tue Feb 08, 2022 12:03 am I read the guy was a drug dealer who robbed Kamaras friend.
So let me get this straight:
Friend: Committing a crime by buying drugs.
Dude: Is also committing a crime by selling them, but Dude then commits a second crime by robbing Friend as part of the original drug crime.
Friend: Reciprocates with a second crime of his own by assaulting Dude.
Kamara: Feeling left out, commits his own crime by joining Friend in the assault on Dude.
Out of this, we have decided that Kamara is justified because of the robbery part? Cool. I had to chart it out, but I think I understand it now.