Fucking yeah
Tampa Bay Buccaneers Official 2023 Off Season Thread
Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Official 2023 Off Season Thread
BucsNBills wrote: ↑Mon Mar 13, 2023 12:57 pmGotta keep up with the Rams for the race for Caleb Williams.
By next offseason I expect more names than just Mr Williams.
Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Official 2023 Off Season Thread
If it meant no baker? Then I hope they re-sign LVD immediately.
Lamar? That’s a big can of worms. But probably, yeah.

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Official 2023 Off Season Thread
Reminder: there are hundreds and hundreds that didnt get invited to the combine.
Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Official 2023 Off Season Thread
I would love to see a historical chart of teams who have drafted away from the combine players.
Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Official 2023 Off Season Thread
Great job resigning Jamel Dean. Didn't think we would have the money so that's nice. It'll be interesting to see his contract details once they come out.
Color me surprised that Nacho got signed before LVD did. I guess the off-ball linebacker market is a bit cool.
Color me surprised that Nacho got signed before LVD did. I guess the off-ball linebacker market is a bit cool.

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Official 2023 Off Season Thread
There are a number of our free agents that just may take a pay cut in order for a chance to extend their careers.
Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Official 2023 Off Season Thread
Worth every penny
According to NFL Next Gen Stats, Dean, who turned 26 in October, allowed 386 yards as the nearest defender -- fifth fewest among players with a minimum of 60 targets. He also allowed a 46.6 completion percentage. He finished the season with a fractured big toe.
-
- Posts: 7003
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 12:59 pm
- Reputation: 2730
Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Official 2023 Off Season Thread
If giving up LVD means we get Lamar then I shake LVD’s hand, wish him well & tell him he will be inducted into the ROH 1 year after retirement.
Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Official 2023 Off Season Thread
Ah ha. Lamar look good in red
That was the only pic I found
That was the only pic I found
- BucsNBills
- Posts: 3416
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2022 1:50 pm
- Reputation: 1125
Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Official 2023 Off Season Thread
We're basically paying Dean and CD3 nearly the same APY combined that Jalen Ramsey makes on his own. We definitely got good deals with both our top corners.
We're paying the price for a half-measure taken by The Union 160 years ago.
The New Union will correct that mistake.
The New Union will correct that mistake.
- BucsNBills
- Posts: 3416
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2022 1:50 pm
- Reputation: 1125
Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Official 2023 Off Season Thread
Damn that makes it feel almost real.
We're paying the price for a half-measure taken by The Union 160 years ago.
The New Union will correct that mistake.
The New Union will correct that mistake.
-
- Posts: 8579
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
- Reputation: 3202
Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Official 2023 Off Season Thread
Say what you want about Bowles, but it's a testament to him that both of them clearly wanted to stay here, and that is definitely saying something.BucsNBills wrote: ↑Mon Mar 13, 2023 8:36 pm We're basically paying Dean and CD3 nearly the same APY combined that Jalen Ramsey makes on his own. We definitely got good deals with both our top corners.
Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Official 2023 Off Season Thread
So we are cap compliant, kept our best corner, will likely keep Lavonte, cut under performers in Smith and Fournette.
I have nothing but praise for how this offseason has been handled so far.
I have nothing but praise for how this offseason has been handled so far.
-
- Posts: 1507
- Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2021 2:38 pm
- Reputation: 654
Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Official 2023 Off Season Thread
I’m shocked we kept Dean. I’m glad though, our defense isn’t getting as wrecked as I thought.
Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Official 2023 Off Season Thread
Since we paid the money on the void years, wouldn't that become immediately due for us? i doubt the new team would suffer the cap hit. Then again, who wanted to ship a player with void years?Bootz wrote: ↑Mon Mar 13, 2023 2:22 pmHis deal also comes with 4 void years. No team is gonna take that on in addition to his $7.5mil salary.Cheb wrote: ↑Mon Mar 13, 2023 2:16 pm
I also would be surprised if we can find a trade partner, but there is alot of movement with guards at the start of the legal tampering period, so maybe somebody would get desperate? I wouldn't hold my breath.
It doesn't matter if we cut or trade him from a savings perspective, the Bucs get $5.3 million in cap space with $4.3 million in dead cap either way.
Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Official 2023 Off Season Thread
The replacement plan for both Dean and Davis needs to be in effect before their contracts run out.Miller4Prez64 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 13, 2023 9:13 pm I’m shocked we kept Dean. I’m glad though, our defense isn’t getting as wrecked as I thought.
Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Official 2023 Off Season Thread
I'm also happy we kept Dean. I feel a RB and OLine and the rest defense now, a slot defender for sure also
-
- Posts: 1506
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2021 10:24 pm
- Reputation: 376
Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Official 2023 Off Season Thread
The Bucs need to move at least one player so they have the salary cap space to sign LVD.
Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Official 2023 Off Season Thread
So Jimmy G to Raiders, Winston to Saints, Aaron Rodgers to Jets/Packers or retire and Young/Stroud/Richardson to Panthers
We’ll be stuck with Mayfield/Trask. Terrific
We’ll be stuck with Mayfield/Trask. Terrific
Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Official 2023 Off Season Thread
Jimmy G - trash
Winston - trash
Aaron Rodgers - great
Rookie QB - probably good
Mayfield- trash
Trask - probably trash, maybe better
So our QB situation is the same floor as Raiders/Saints but with a higher ceiling as Trask is unproven.
Unless we land lamar that’s all we can really expect
Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Official 2023 Off Season Thread
Up until a few days ago, we had the least cap space in the NFL. We knew from the jump that we could be outbid for the expensive guys and that's okay.
This year we will have to win with Trask or his cheap veteran/rookie counterpart at QB. We've known that for months and that's okay. We are paying Tom Brady $35 million to sit on his couch, and this season is the price for that prior success.
Breathe, my friend. Either the Bucs QBs will do well this year, in which case we are aces, or they will not and we will know that we need to replace them, and will have the resources to do so next year.
Have patience.

Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Official 2023 Off Season Thread
Shaq Mason is on the block.
Devin White SHOULD be on the block.
Devin White SHOULD be on the block.
"So let's get to the point
Let's roll another joint
And let's head on down the road
There's somewhere I got to go..."
Let's roll another joint
And let's head on down the road
There's somewhere I got to go..."
Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Official 2023 Off Season Thread
So like I've been thinking all along, if we lose all defensive line and outside linebacker free agents or say most of them - we draft them - period. Every free agent has been we try to replace with more free agent has beens will just take away comp picks. We need 4 year contracts that work for us.
Nacho definitely wasnt a team coat hanger.
Nacho definitely wasnt a team coat hanger.
Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Official 2023 Off Season Thread
We Re-Sign LVD, which we should do anyway, and we let KJ Britt battle it out with the rabble for the time being, unless we find a guy we like in this class. We save $12 mil by trading him and we can probably get a top 50 pick in return.
This to me makes infinitely more sense than paying him. He's not that guy and we, above all others, know that.
"So let's get to the point
Let's roll another joint
And let's head on down the road
There's somewhere I got to go..."
Let's roll another joint
And let's head on down the road
There's somewhere I got to go..."
- BucsNBills
- Posts: 3416
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2022 1:50 pm
- Reputation: 1125
Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Official 2023 Off Season Thread
Wouldn't mind bringing Calais Campbell in on a 1 year mercenary deal. He's still playing a high level and would bolster the dline for cheap.
We're paying the price for a half-measure taken by The Union 160 years ago.
The New Union will correct that mistake.
The New Union will correct that mistake.
- BucsNBills
- Posts: 3416
- Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2022 1:50 pm
- Reputation: 1125
Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Official 2023 Off Season Thread
White is the teachers pet, so sadly there's zero chance we trade him, even though we should.MJW wrote: ↑Tue Mar 14, 2023 6:31 amWe Re-Sign LVD, which we should do anyway, and we let KJ Britt battle it out with the rabble for the time being, unless we find a guy we like in this class. We save $12 mil by trading him and we can probably get a top 50 pick in return.
This to me makes infinitely more sense than paying him. He's not that guy and we, above all others, know that.
We're paying the price for a half-measure taken by The Union 160 years ago.
The New Union will correct that mistake.
The New Union will correct that mistake.
Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Official 2023 Off Season Thread
Any if the last three years, sure. But WTF sense does it make to bring him here this year?BucsNBills wrote: ↑Tue Mar 14, 2023 6:52 am Wouldn't mind bringing Calais Campbell in on a 1 year mercenary deal. He's still playing a high level and would bolster the dline for cheap.
- Bootz
- Posts: 15962
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
- Reputation: 5036
- Location: In that dome of yours
Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Official 2023 Off Season Thread
If you could "probably" get a top 50 pick for a guy, then you have no reason to trade him unless you can't afford him or he asks to be traded. No team is gonna trade for him if he nit "that guy", no less give up a top 50 pick for him.MJW wrote: ↑Tue Mar 14, 2023 6:31 amWe Re-Sign LVD, which we should do anyway, and we let KJ Britt battle it out with the rabble for the time being, unless we find a guy we like in this class. We save $12 mil by trading him and we can probably get a top 50 pick in return.
This to me makes infinitely more sense than paying him. He's not that guy and we, above all others, know that.
Most hated man in America.
Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Official 2023 Off Season Thread
You're assuming every GM is smart. We know better. The athletic ability is 1%. The flash plays are jaw-dropping. Some team will look at him and his age and decide they can fix the lacking parts of the game.Bootz wrote: ↑Tue Mar 14, 2023 8:07 amIf you could "probably" get a top 50 pick for a guy, then you have no reason to trade him unless you can't afford him or he asks to be traded. No team is gonna trade for him if he nit "that guy", no less give up a top 50 pick for him.MJW wrote: ↑Tue Mar 14, 2023 6:31 am
We Re-Sign LVD, which we should do anyway, and we let KJ Britt battle it out with the rabble for the time being, unless we find a guy we like in this class. We save $12 mil by trading him and we can probably get a top 50 pick in return.
This to me makes infinitely more sense than paying him. He's not that guy and we, above all others, know that.
Also, his 5th year option money ($11 Mil) comes right off the books. That's a win-win for me.
"So let's get to the point
Let's roll another joint
And let's head on down the road
There's somewhere I got to go..."
Let's roll another joint
And let's head on down the road
There's somewhere I got to go..."
Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Official 2023 Off Season Thread
That’s the dumbest logic ever. Sam Bradford was traded for a first rounder after years of being terrible. The patriots traded a 2nd rounder for Mohammad fucking Sanu.Bootz wrote: ↑Tue Mar 14, 2023 8:07 amIf you could "probably" get a top 50 pick for a guy, then you have no reason to trade him unless you can't afford him or he asks to be traded. No team is gonna trade for him if he nit "that guy", no less give up a top 50 pick for him.MJW wrote: ↑Tue Mar 14, 2023 6:31 am
We Re-Sign LVD, which we should do anyway, and we let KJ Britt battle it out with the rabble for the time being, unless we find a guy we like in this class. We save $12 mil by trading him and we can probably get a top 50 pick in return.
This to me makes infinitely more sense than paying him. He's not that guy and we, above all others, know that.
Re: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Official 2023 Off Season Thread
If you can get a good pick for White, you should definitely do that.
There’s a poorly run organization out there willing to acquire him.
There’s a poorly run organization out there willing to acquire him.
