@Bootz (yes, you read that right, I said YOU!) @acmillis @CannonFire @Buc2
The rest of the Bucs fans? Hell yeah!
@Bootz (yes, you read that right, I said YOU!) @acmillis @CannonFire @Buc2
No, it shouldn’t: Joe Flacco and Nick Foles were also SB MVPs in recent years. Hell, Eli was named SB MVP twice. Wins and one game awards/performances should not a a barometer for contracts or who is a good player. Timmy Smith ring a bell?Bootz wrote: ↑Wed Jul 30, 2025 4:53 pmMost would also say if you’re using TD passes as your barometer when it comes to contract negotiations that you have no clue what you’re doing. Additionally, using your logic you just answered your “why is Burrow seen as elite” question. He puts up pretty stats.Grahamburn wrote: ↑Wed Jul 30, 2025 4:10 pm "Force the situation" by signing the league leader in TD passes the last two years to an $8M prove it contract and then the best value QB contract in the NFL? Lulz. That's one way to put it. Most would call it a good problem to have.
Best value QB contract right now is by far Jalen Hurts. 11th highest paid QB is the reigning SB MVP. That SHOULD be your barometer. Not stats.
Oh no, Licht, please stop...Grahamburn wrote: ↑Wed Jul 30, 2025 4:10 pm "Force the situation" by signing the league leader in TD passes the last two years to an $8M prove it contract and then the best value QB contract in the NFL? Lulz. That's one way to put it. Most would call it a good problem to have.
Glitching again. Thought you said YES!
So TD passes is the ultimate goal? Got it.Pirate Life wrote: ↑Wed Jul 30, 2025 7:11 pmNo, it shouldn’t: Joe Flacco and Nick Foles were also SB MVPs in recent years. Hell, Eli was named SB MVP twice. Wins and one game awards/performances should not a a barometer for contracts or who is a good player. Timmy Smith ring a bell?Bootz wrote: ↑Wed Jul 30, 2025 4:53 pm
Most would also say if you’re using TD passes as your barometer when it comes to contract negotiations that you have no clue what you’re doing. Additionally, using your logic you just answered your “why is Burrow seen as elite” question. He puts up pretty stats.
Best value QB contract right now is by far Jalen Hurts. 11th highest paid QB is the reigning SB MVP. That SHOULD be your barometer. Not stats.
Stroking my ego too much?Doctor wrote: ↑Wed Jul 30, 2025 8:07 pmOh no, Licht, please stop...Grahamburn wrote: ↑Wed Jul 30, 2025 4:10 pm "Force the situation" by signing the league leader in TD passes the last two years to an $8M prove it contract and then the best value QB contract in the NFL? Lulz. That's one way to put it. Most would call it a good problem to have.
1st in TD passes. 2nd in yards. 3rd in completions. The ultimate goal? No. Of course not. But, there’s a level of evaluation for QBs based on statistics and the validity of those stats that you don’t seem to like to acknowledge. Ultimately, they’re kind of important to a QBs’ success toward achieving the ultimate goal.Bootz wrote: ↑Wed Jul 30, 2025 8:26 pmSo TD passes is the ultimate goal? Got it.Pirate Life wrote: ↑Wed Jul 30, 2025 7:11 pm
No, it shouldn’t: Joe Flacco and Nick Foles were also SB MVPs in recent years. Hell, Eli was named SB MVP twice. Wins and one game awards/performances should not a a barometer for contracts or who is a good player. Timmy Smith ring a bell?
So Baker is better than Josh Allen or Lamar Jackson?Grahamburn wrote: ↑Wed Jul 30, 2025 8:50 pm1st in TD passes. 2nd in yards. 3rd in completions. The ultimate goal? No. Of course not. But, there’s a level of evaluation for QBs based on statistics and the validity of those stats that you don’t seem to like to acknowledge. Ultimately, they’re kind of important to a QBs’ success toward achieving the ultimate goal.
But, you know that. You just can’t help yourself.
Well, what is better? All 3 of those QBs led top 5 offenses last year. Each of them are better at certain aspects of the job than others.Bootz wrote: ↑Wed Jul 30, 2025 9:02 pmSo Baker is better than Josh Allen or Lamar Jackson?Grahamburn wrote: ↑Wed Jul 30, 2025 8:50 pm
1st in TD passes. 2nd in yards. 3rd in completions. The ultimate goal? No. Of course not. But, there’s a level of evaluation for QBs based on statistics and the validity of those stats that you don’t seem to like to acknowledge. Ultimately, they’re kind of important to a QBs’ success toward achieving the ultimate goal.
But, you know that. You just can’t help yourself.
You know what I'm asking.Grahamburn wrote: ↑Wed Jul 30, 2025 9:33 pmWell, what is better? All 3 of those QBs led top 5 offenses last year. Each of them are better at certain aspects of the job than others.
He’s not the running threat they are, but he’s a better passer than both.
None have a championship. All 3 have been close leading their teams to multiple playoff appearances.
Baker has been as close to beating Mahomes in the playoffs as either of them.
They all came in the same draft. Is Baker worse because he started his career in the worst organization?
What is he now in Tampa?
Interesting things to think about.
Nah, didn't make that argument and never have. Gotta stop having knee-jerk reactions like that and try to... well, Bootz up the discussion by putting opinions on people.Bootz wrote: ↑Wed Jul 30, 2025 8:26 pmSo TD passes is the ultimate goal? Got it.Pirate Life wrote: ↑Wed Jul 30, 2025 7:11 pm
No, it shouldn’t: Joe Flacco and Nick Foles were also SB MVPs in recent years. Hell, Eli was named SB MVP twice. Wins and one game awards/performances should not a a barometer for contracts or who is a good player. Timmy Smith ring a bell?
Yeah, I've made those arguments... you just never read them because you get triggered in the first two sentences of a post and go on a rant. You still think I believe Mayfield stinks and want the team to lose.Pirate Life wrote: ↑Wed Jul 30, 2025 11:31 pmNah, didn't make that argument and never have. Gotta stop having knee-jerk reactions like that and try to... well, Bootz up the discussion by putting opinions on people.
Ultimate goal should be how they perform on the field, how they run the offense and how consistent they are, toss in a few good intangibles as well - almost all of the great/really good QBs separate from the pack based on stuff like leadership, processing speed or chemistry with their teammates.The ones with pure physical talents that can take over a game or two (Vick in his day, Herbert now - Jeff George going back further) usually end up getting paid more than they should because their stats tend to not equate to team success.
Better argument to make for Hurts would be his leadership qualities. He's not the best passer and he's good with his legs. He's actually a better argument for CannonFire's logic of why he doesn't think Mayfield is the best fit. He's got a great team around him and some of the other QBs at his level would likely perform better than him on the same team. Put Hurts on another team, say the Ravens I'm not sure he does as well as Jackson would do with the Eagles if they swap places. But Jackson likely does better than any other QB you'd swap him with imo.
I don’t, really? Not being obtuse.Bootz wrote: ↑Wed Jul 30, 2025 9:59 pmYou know what I'm asking.Grahamburn wrote: ↑Wed Jul 30, 2025 9:33 pm
Well, what is better? All 3 of those QBs led top 5 offenses last year. Each of them are better at certain aspects of the job than others.
He’s not the running threat they are, but he’s a better passer than both.
None have a championship. All 3 have been close leading their teams to multiple playoff appearances.
Baker has been as close to beating Mahomes in the playoffs as either of them.
They all came in the same draft. Is Baker worse because he started his career in the worst organization?
What is he now in Tampa?
Interesting things to think about.
Are you saying Baker Mayfield >>> Lamar Jackson/Josh Allen.
Yes. Substantially.CannonFire wrote: ↑Wed Jul 30, 2025 2:47 pm ... Is our team really better than last year? I don't think so...
I'd feel more confident if Wirfs and Godwin were healthy to start the season.__Chef__ wrote: ↑Thu Jul 31, 2025 10:48 amYes. Substantially.CannonFire wrote: ↑Wed Jul 30, 2025 2:47 pm ... Is our team really better than last year? I don't think so...
The guys who were impressive rookies last year aren't finding their way this year. The guys who are about to be impressive rookies this year haven't hit the field yet.
Add to it Reddick, and yes, I think this team is ready to make a run when everyone else is sleeping on us.
As long as they're healthy by the end of the season, that's what counts.Grahamburn wrote: ↑Thu Jul 31, 2025 11:11 amI'd feel more confident if Wirfs and Godwin were healthy to start the season.__Chef__ wrote: ↑Thu Jul 31, 2025 10:48 am
Yes. Substantially.
The guys who were impressive rookies last year aren't finding their way this year. The guys who are about to be impressive rookies this year haven't hit the field yet.
Add to it Reddick, and yes, I think this team is ready to make a run when everyone else is sleeping on us.
Nope, I don’t think that and have never said that. I think Mayfield is better than you give him credit for and that he’s better than a lot of guys you say are on par or better than him. Also that you move the goal post trying to defend your position. His contract didn’t become a sticking point for you until this off season for instance.CannonFire wrote: ↑Thu Jul 31, 2025 6:52 amYeah, I've made those arguments... you just never read them because you get triggered in the first two sentences of a post and go on a rant. You still think I believe Mayfield stinks and want the team to lose.Pirate Life wrote: ↑Wed Jul 30, 2025 11:31 pm
Nah, didn't make that argument and never have. Gotta stop having knee-jerk reactions like that and try to... well, Bootz up the discussion by putting opinions on people.
Ultimate goal should be how they perform on the field, how they run the offense and how consistent they are, toss in a few good intangibles as well - almost all of the great/really good QBs separate from the pack based on stuff like leadership, processing speed or chemistry with their teammates.The ones with pure physical talents that can take over a game or two (Vick in his day, Herbert now - Jeff George going back further) usually end up getting paid more than they should because their stats tend to not equate to team success.
Better argument to make for Hurts would be his leadership qualities. He's not the best passer and he's good with his legs. He's actually a better argument for CannonFire's logic of why he doesn't think Mayfield is the best fit. He's got a great team around him and some of the other QBs at his level would likely perform better than him on the same team. Put Hurts on another team, say the Ravens I'm not sure he does as well as Jackson would do with the Eagles if they swap places. But Jackson likely does better than any other QB you'd swap him with imo.
Substantially?__Chef__ wrote: ↑Thu Jul 31, 2025 10:48 amYes. Substantially.CannonFire wrote: ↑Wed Jul 30, 2025 2:47 pm ... Is our team really better than last year? I don't think so...
The guys who were impressive rookies last year aren't finding their way this year. The guys who are about to be impressive rookies this year haven't hit the field yet.
Add to it Reddick, and yes, I think this team is ready to make a run when everyone else is sleeping on us.
Ok, my bad. I grouped you in with the crybabies who didn't like when I said there are 5 elite QB's and listed 20 guys in alphabetical order, who were the same guy. They said I was afraid to rank them. I gave them a list I knew would trigger them.Pirate Life wrote: ↑Thu Jul 31, 2025 12:22 pmNope, I don’t think that and have never said that. I think Mayfield is better than you give him credit for and that he’s better than a lot of guys you say are on par or better than him. Also that you move the goal post trying to defend your position. His contract didn’t become a sticking point for you until this off season for instance.CannonFire wrote: ↑Thu Jul 31, 2025 6:52 am
Yeah, I've made those arguments... you just never read them because you get triggered in the first two sentences of a post and go on a rant. You still think I believe Mayfield stinks and want the team to lose.
No, by giving him a contract that was backend loaded with voidable years, then after a re-structure, backloaded it more... with another voidable year. If he really believed in Mayfield, after the 2023, he should've given him a 5 year deal. The 2023 season wasn't anything special. It was another "average" year, not much different that his two best years in Cleveland.Grahamburn wrote: ↑Wed Jul 30, 2025 4:10 pm "Force the situation" by signing the league leader in TD passes the last two years to an $8M prove it contract and then the best value QB contract in the NFL? Lulz. That's one way to put it. Most would call it a good problem to have.
I just don't feel like you're realistic in your assessment of how this QB contract world works. All these guys are getting voidable years, restructures, and back-loaded contracts. Literally all of them. Nobody is signing the contracts you're suggesting with 5 year Revis deals where nothing is guaranteed beyond year one. "I'd give him this," well, that's great, but no QB is taking that, and I think that's why people think you "hate" Mayfield. Because what you suggest is simply not realistic.CannonFire wrote: ↑Thu Jul 31, 2025 5:17 pmNo, by giving him a contract that was backend loaded with voidable years, then after a re-structure, backloaded it more... with another voidable year. If he really believed in Mayfield, after the 2023, he should've given him a 5 year deal. The 2023 season wasn't anything special. It was another "average" year, not much different that his two best years in Cleveland.Grahamburn wrote: ↑Wed Jul 30, 2025 4:10 pm "Force the situation" by signing the league leader in TD passes the last two years to an $8M prove it contract and then the best value QB contract in the NFL? Lulz. That's one way to put it. Most would call it a good problem to have.
This isn't necessarily true. Sometimes a rookie beats out a starter. I don't think Dean is some lockdown impact corner out there. I think chances are high that he will be replaced by Morrison. Zyon is okay, but again, if Parrish keeps pushing, he might force playing time on the outside as well. Having corners that are ballhawks improves our entire team. Having Tykee Smith (a ballhawk) playing next to AWJ (a ballhawk) will also improve our secondary.CannonFire wrote: ↑Thu Jul 31, 2025 5:05 pm Not every rookie is even going to have a chance to make an impact... and if he does, he'll be replacing a starter who likely got hurt...
CannonFire wrote: ↑Thu Jul 31, 2025 5:12 pmOk, my bad. I grouped you in with the crybabies who didn't like when I said there are 5 elite QB's and listed 20 guys in alphabetical order, who were the same guy. They said I was afraid to rank them. I gave them a list I knew would trigger them.Pirate Life wrote: ↑Thu Jul 31, 2025 12:22 pm
Nope, I don’t think that and have never said that. I think Mayfield is better than you give him credit for and that he’s better than a lot of guys you say are on par or better than him. Also that you move the goal post trying to defend your position. His contract didn’t become a sticking point for you until this off season for instance.
My goal posts never changed because I always said I think Mayfield is an adequate started... made better by his teammates (not the other way around). I think that's the same almost every QB. That's never changed... ever.
The contract has always been a sticking point of mine since he re-signed after the 2023 season. I knew that deal was structure (high back-end w/voidable years), was going to need to be restructured. I don't like that for guys who aren't difference makers. I've never waivered off of that. I don't know what goal posts you think I'm moving.
My biggest issue has ALWAYS been with Licht, not Mayfield. I just think people overrate Mayfield.
It really boils down to this.
Nope.