All I read was he worked for Bruce.
2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread
- Bootz
- Posts: 16938
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
- Reputation: 5414
- Location: In that dome of yours
Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread
He initially worked with Todd in Philadelphia. Then for Bruce with Todd in Arizona. Then for Todd in New York. Then for Bruce and with Todd again in Tampa. 3 years in Jacksonville & Las Vegas, now he's back working for Todd.
Most hated man in America.
- Central_Buc
- Posts: 2959
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2021 5:50 am
- Reputation: 864
-
Grahamburn
- Posts: 8934
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
- Reputation: 3392
Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread
Good year to need a pass rush band aid though.
- Babeinbucland
- Posts: 9553
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 11:33 pm
- Reputation: 3590
- Location: All up in your head
Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread
It is for sure, but I wonder why they would not give him a paid position?Cheb wrote: ↑Mon Feb 10, 2025 2:58 pmI love that Ronde Barber seemingly has an unofficial team position. Spokesperson, analyst, by rumor a "kitchen cabinet" member on Licht's staff. The man seems to live and breathe Bucs' football, a Hall of Famer who retains ties to the team and community.0-26 Survivor wrote: ↑Mon Feb 10, 2025 1:05 pm I really hadn’t given it much thought. Until I got that email this morning.
50 years.
Wow,
And I think that's beautiful.

I said what I said
I've got a soft heart and a savage mouth.
I'm like a Hallmark card written by Tupac.
-
Grahamburn
- Posts: 8934
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
- Reputation: 3392
-
Grahamburn
- Posts: 8934
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
- Reputation: 3392
-
Grahamburn
- Posts: 8934
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
- Reputation: 3392
Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread
The facts are he had a serious injury, missed a lot of time,” Licht said in a press conference. “There’s still some uncertainty with any injury like that at this point, so move the void so it gives us more options, more flexibility as it pertains to him. We just gotta make a good decision, but we hopefully can come to an agreement with him because Chris means the world to this organization.”
- BuccaNOLEer
- Posts: 1938
- Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2023 8:39 am
- Reputation: 621
- Location: Orlando, FL
Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread
Bucs are moving on from Jordan Whitehead. He wasn't the same when he came back.
Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread
Woah, now we only have nine safeties left.BuccaNOLEer wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 1:44 pm Bucs are moving on from Jordan Whitehead. He wasn't the same when he came back.
-
Grahamburn
- Posts: 8934
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
- Reputation: 3392
Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread
Solidifying Tykee Smith's move to safety. Izien would be the slot corner. For now.
Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread
We just keep swinging and missing in that second safety. We're pretty good at finding that rotational 3rd, but that steadfast starter eludes us.
Maybe we found a gem in Merriweather. Maybe Tykee moves over, though I really do love him in the slot. Either way, I'd love to bring in more viable contingency/competition options via FA or draft.
Maybe we found a gem in Merriweather. Maybe Tykee moves over, though I really do love him in the slot. Either way, I'd love to bring in more viable contingency/competition options via FA or draft.

- Bootz
- Posts: 16938
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
- Reputation: 5414
- Location: In that dome of yours
Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread
I don't understand this organization sometimes. Tykee Smith played 4 snaps at safety all season long. He's literally never played that position before. Why are we penciling him in at starting safety? Furthermore, wasn't he playing well in his nickel/slot role? I hope this is just for the time being because this is not the answer.
We try to put players where they shouldn't be all too often and then act shocked when it doesn't work out.
We try to put players where they shouldn't be all too often and then act shocked when it doesn't work out.
Most hated man in America.
- Bootz
- Posts: 16938
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
- Reputation: 5414
- Location: In that dome of yours
Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread
I don't get moving him to safety at all. What is it based off of? 4 snaps at safety all season long. He doesn't really profile as a safety. He has value in the slot because he's a pretty good tackler.Doctor wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 4:00 pm We just keep swinging and missing in that second safety. We're pretty good at finding that rotational 3rd, but that steadfast starter eludes us.
Maybe we found a gem in Merriweather. Maybe Tykee moves over, though I really do love him in the slot. Either way, I'd love to bring in more viable contingency/competition options via FA or draft.
I too hope this is just for the time being and not the actual plan.
Most hated man in America.
- Bootz
- Posts: 16938
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
- Reputation: 5414
- Location: In that dome of yours
Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread
"You did everything right except your job".
Most hated man in America.
Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread
Per Bowles, in Nickel Tykee is on the field 75% of the time, if he is a starting safety he would be on the field 100% of the time. He further implied he would not just play safety but also nickel. So yes starting safety 100% of snaps not all of them at safety. Who knows, 50%/50% at safety/nickel and see how it goes? Bowles also mentioned how good Tykee was in space which I assume was his reasoning for the moveBootz wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 6:19 pmI don't get moving him to safety at all. What is it based off of? 4 snaps at safety all season long. He doesn't really profile as a safety. He has value in the slot because he's a pretty good tackler.Doctor wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 4:00 pm We just keep swinging and missing in that second safety. We're pretty good at finding that rotational 3rd, but that steadfast starter eludes us.
Maybe we found a gem in Merriweather. Maybe Tykee moves over, though I really do love him in the slot. Either way, I'd love to bring in more viable contingency/competition options via FA or draft.
I too hope this is just for the time being and not the actual plan.
-
Grahamburn
- Posts: 8934
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
- Reputation: 3392
Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread
https://www.pewterreport.com/tykee-smit ... rom-lions/Bootz wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 6:17 pm I don't understand this organization sometimes. Tykee Smith played 4 snaps at safety all season long. He's literally never played that position before. Why are we penciling him in at starting safety? Furthermore, wasn't he playing well in his nickel/slot role? I hope this is just for the time being because this is not the answer.
We try to put players where they shouldn't be all too often and then act shocked when it doesn't work out.
Good article on the pros of the switch and thought process.
I also agree that this move signals an addition like Hobbs in free agency or the drafting of Barron and/or another corner early in the draft.
They’re acknowledging significant deficiencies in the secondary last year and making moves to correct them.
Also, I can’t think of players we’ve asked to switch positions where it hasn’t worked out?
Converting college tackles to guard has worked like 100% of the time outside of Goedeke, who was moved out of total desperation. Moving Wirfs to LT obviously worked. Mauch worked. Marpet worked. Barton was drafted to be our center but he moved from LT. Worked.
Am I forgetting someone? Cappa worked.
- Bootz
- Posts: 16938
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
- Reputation: 5414
- Location: In that dome of yours
Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread
It seems the bar you set for whether or not something worked is extremely low. "Worked out well enough" is moreso what you're saying.Grahamburn wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2025 7:08 amhttps://www.pewterreport.com/tykee-smit ... rom-lions/Bootz wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2025 6:17 pm I don't understand this organization sometimes. Tykee Smith played 4 snaps at safety all season long. He's literally never played that position before. Why are we penciling him in at starting safety? Furthermore, wasn't he playing well in his nickel/slot role? I hope this is just for the time being because this is not the answer.
We try to put players where they shouldn't be all too often and then act shocked when it doesn't work out.
Good article on the pros of the switch and thought process.
I also agree that this move signals an addition like Hobbs in free agency or the drafting of Barron and/or another corner early in the draft.
They’re acknowledging significant deficiencies in the secondary last year and making moves to correct them.
Also, I can’t think of players we’ve asked to switch positions where it hasn’t worked out?
Converting college tackles to guard has worked like 100% of the time outside of Goedeke, who was moved out of total desperation. Moving Wirfs to LT obviously worked. Mauch worked. Marpet worked. Barton was drafted to be our center but he moved from LT. Worked.
Am I forgetting someone? Cappa worked.
Saying Alex Cappa's move to G worked is hilarious. Cappa was the weak link on our OL in his time here and we let him walk accordingly. All he did was get even worse in Cincinnati. Think about this: 2021 both Cappa & Donovan going into their contact years and we give Donovan Smith the extension. Cappa was not good.
Moving Robert Hainsey to C did not work, otherwise Barton wouldn't be here. Also, can we really say Barton has worked? He graded out as one of the worst C in football. A bit premature there.
Wirfs played LT before, so that's not exactly a full on switch. Marpet's move to the interior worked after a lot of trial and error. He crashed out at C. For whatever reason he was bet at LG than RG.
Back to Tykee, not getting the move, although if @kaimaru is correct then this seems to just be in name only, which I doubt. It's dumb to even say the only reason a guy was on the field 75% of the time vs 100% was because of his official position. He's not an OL who has to report eligible. This isn't Madden. There was nothing stopping us from utilizing Tykee more if we really wanted to.
Most hated man in America.
-
Grahamburn
- Posts: 8934
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
- Reputation: 3392
Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread
Maybe they weren’t prepared and/or he wasn’t prepared to deploy him that way. With a full off-season things could be different?
The things he does well are inherent to good safety play. High IQ. Good tackler. Zone integrity. I’m not going to crown it, but it does make some sense.
The things he does well are inherent to good safety play. High IQ. Good tackler. Zone integrity. I’m not going to crown it, but it does make some sense.
Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread
Cappa worked well enough to win a SB.
What does this "not worked" label mean for you? Worked well enough to not be replaced/improved? That's a lofty standard. Hainsey gave us plenty of good snaps as a starting center, along with some poor ones.
For years people bashed D Smith. He wasn't replaced, he was improved upon eventually, but he still worked well enough for many years including for a chip.
What does this "not worked" label mean for you? Worked well enough to not be replaced/improved? That's a lofty standard. Hainsey gave us plenty of good snaps as a starting center, along with some poor ones.
For years people bashed D Smith. He wasn't replaced, he was improved upon eventually, but he still worked well enough for many years including for a chip.

-
Grahamburn
- Posts: 8934
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
- Reputation: 3392
Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread
Hainsey was also not supposed to be the starter. It could be argued that he was an incredible pick simply because he had enough ability to actually step in and start for two years after playing tackle exclusively in college.Doctor wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2025 2:03 pm Cappa worked well enough to win a SB.
What does this "not worked" label mean for you? Worked well enough to not be replaced/improved? That's a lofty standard. Hainsey gave us plenty of good snaps as a starting center, along with some poor ones.
For years people bashed D Smith. He wasn't replaced, he was improved upon eventually, but he still worked well enough for many years including for a chip.
Good chance he’s competing for a starting role in 2025 somewhere.
Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread
I swear. Some football minds get off on the idea of making do with less. Gruden did the same thing on offense. Gradkowski!

- Bootz
- Posts: 16938
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
- Reputation: 5414
- Location: In that dome of yours
Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread
Winning a Superbowl doesn't mean all 53 men on your roster were amazing top notch players.Doctor wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2025 2:03 pm Cappa worked well enough to win a SB.
What does this "not worked" label mean for you? Worked well enough to not be replaced/improved? That's a lofty standard. Hainsey gave us plenty of good snaps as a starting center, along with some poor ones.
For years people bashed D Smith. He wasn't replaced, he was improved upon eventually, but he still worked well enough for many years including for a chip.
Lofty standards at the NFL, "pay me millions of dollars" level should not only be expected but should be embraced in principle alone.
Hainsey gave us some many good snaps that we chose to replace him with a rookie who hadn't played the position much and didn't offer him to opportunity to compete for a starting spot elsewhere.
I swear if you ever chose to have objective and honest conversations about this team on all matters it would be fun and informative. But that's not who you are, so here we are.
Most hated man in America.
- Bootz
- Posts: 16938
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
- Reputation: 5414
- Location: In that dome of yours
Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread
It strokes their own personal egos and genius.
Most hated man in America.
- Bootz
- Posts: 16938
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2023 1:55 pm
- Reputation: 5414
- Location: In that dome of yours
Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread
Most hated man in America.
-
Grahamburn
- Posts: 8934
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 8:50 pm
- Reputation: 3392
Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread
Gruden being removed from the RoH was peak prisoner of the moment, soft, globalist, I suck at vocabulary. I’m glad to be on the right side of history. Again.
Principles vs fake principles.
We ain’t done until the Redskins come back. And they will.
Principles vs fake principles.
We ain’t done until the Redskins come back. And they will.

Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread
Good to see Gruden back in ring of honor. Should have never lost his spot to begin with. Kudos to Glazers for rectifying their error.
Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread
While your phrasing and approach is gross as usual, you're not wrong. They should've just bit down and let the storm pass. Maintains a simple, firm line between on field and off and it removes all judgement calls.

Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread
Agreed. The Glazers were, to my disappointment, a bunch of spineless assholes to pile up on Gruden.
Kudos to the legendary QB Killa. He was one of the very very few football related people outside the Raiders organization who stood up strongly for Gruden.
- Central_Buc
- Posts: 2959
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2021 5:50 am
- Reputation: 864
Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread
Just a thought, They may have faced pressure around the league to take him off.
Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread
I'm sure they did. But the good thing about being a billionaire owner is, you don't have to give a F what others think you should do.Central_Buc wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2025 10:23 pmJust a thought, They may have faced pressure around the league to take him off.
Re: 2025 Tampa Bay Buccaneers Offseason Thread
@Bootz I am only going off of this SI article. Here are the quotes from Bowles. I agree it makes no sense to move him to safety and not play him at safety, but it sure sounds from the quotes that he would be playing at safety and nickel depending on the situation. Not the first time Bowles has said a headscratcherBootz wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2025 8:51 amIt seems the bar you set for whether or not something worked is extremely low. "Worked out well enough" is moreso what you're saying.Grahamburn wrote: ↑Thu Feb 27, 2025 7:08 am
https://www.pewterreport.com/tykee-smit ... rom-lions/
Good article on the pros of the switch and thought process.
I also agree that this move signals an addition like Hobbs in free agency or the drafting of Barron and/or another corner early in the draft.
They’re acknowledging significant deficiencies in the secondary last year and making moves to correct them.
Also, I can’t think of players we’ve asked to switch positions where it hasn’t worked out?
Converting college tackles to guard has worked like 100% of the time outside of Goedeke, who was moved out of total desperation. Moving Wirfs to LT obviously worked. Mauch worked. Marpet worked. Barton was drafted to be our center but he moved from LT. Worked.
Am I forgetting someone? Cappa worked.
Saying Alex Cappa's move to G worked is hilarious. Cappa was the weak link on our OL in his time here and we let him walk accordingly. All he did was get even worse in Cincinnati. Think about this: 2021 both Cappa & Donovan going into their contact years and we give Donovan Smith the extension. Cappa was not good.
Moving Robert Hainsey to C did not work, otherwise Barton wouldn't be here. Also, can we really say Barton has worked? He graded out as one of the worst C in football. A bit premature there.
Wirfs played LT before, so that's not exactly a full on switch. Marpet's move to the interior worked after a lot of trial and error. He crashed out at C. For whatever reason he was bet at LG than RG.
Back to Tykee, not getting the move, although if @kaimaru is correct then this seems to just be in name only, which I doubt. It's dumb to even say the only reason a guy was on the field 75% of the time vs 100% was because of his official position. He's not an OL who has to report eligible. This isn't Madden. There was nothing stopping us from utilizing Tykee more if we really wanted to.
Bowles:
https://www.si.com/nfl/buccaneers/news/ ... ykee-smith"Yeah, it's definitely something we (Tykee and Bowles) talked about (moving to safety), and going into the spring is something we're going to look at as well. Tykee wants to play safety, so we're definitely going to be looking at it. So it's an option for us."
...
"Oh, he's very comfortable at Nickel. He's our best nickel. Safety obviously stays on the field 100% of the time with a nickel probably 75% of the time, and he wants to be on the field 100% of the time. Doesn't mean he's not going to play from nickel, but he can play more on the base defense."
