Do you still believe Miami won’t win? Georgia Tech? As of now, it seems like the ACC championship game will be between Georgia Tech and Miami.
NCAA football 2025
Re: NCAA football 2025
Pitt is starting to peek around the corner.
Re: NCAA football 2025
Until it happens, it hasn't happened.
That said, looking like this might be the year

Price of your life going up, it's not inflation
Re: NCAA football 2025
Re: NCAA football 2025
…
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: NCAA football 2025
How far up do Indiana and Texas Tech move up?
Re: NCAA football 2025
Ask Snake, as he believes himself to be an expert
Re: NCAA football 2025
PSU fires Franklin. $50M buyout
Whatever administrator agreed to that contract needs to be shown the door as well
Whatever administrator agreed to that contract needs to be shown the door as well
- BuccaNOLEer
- Posts: 1938
- Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2023 8:39 am
- Reputation: 621
- Location: Orlando, FL
- Selmon Rules
- Posts: 2996
- Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2021 7:02 pm
- Reputation: 1184
Re: NCAA football 2025
Franklin was a good coach and I hope it's not a "grass is greener" mentality for Penn State Fans.
It's unbelievable a guy loses 3 games, and who knows how good these teams actually are that we're playing. Allar goes down in the NW game too.
I don’t know. Grass is always greener when it comes to head coaches.
I guess I'm just from the Joe had rough years too.
It's unbelievable a guy loses 3 games, and who knows how good these teams actually are that we're playing. Allar goes down in the NW game too.
I don’t know. Grass is always greener when it comes to head coaches.
I guess I'm just from the Joe had rough years too.

Re: NCAA football 2025
I think you might be onto something here. Franklin was able to win 10 games a year with them. They might not like what comes next.BJJ34 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 13, 2025 4:45 pm Franklin was a good coach and I hope it's not a "grass is greener" mentality for Penn State Fans.
It's unbelievable a guy loses 3 games, and who knows how good these teams actually are that we're playing. Allar goes down in the NW game too.
I don’t know. Grass is always greener when it comes to head coaches.
I guess I'm just from the Joe had rough years too.
It happened to Nebraska when they dumped Solich because they thought they were still a powerhouse program that could compete for titles
Re: NCAA football 2025
Especially considering ALL of our 2027 Recruits are now gone.Zarni wrote: ↑Mon Oct 13, 2025 6:21 pmI think you might be onto something here. Franklin was able to win 10 games a year with them. They might not like what comes next.BJJ34 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 13, 2025 4:45 pm Franklin was a good coach and I hope it's not a "grass is greener" mentality for Penn State Fans.
It's unbelievable a guy loses 3 games, and who knows how good these teams actually are that we're playing. Allar goes down in the NW game too.
I don’t know. Grass is always greener when it comes to head coaches.
I guess I'm just from the Joe had rough years too.
It happened to Nebraska when they dumped Solich because they thought they were still a powerhouse program that could compete for titles

Re: NCAA football 2025
From Outkick today:
The Associated Press Top 25 Poll needs a complete overhaul. And as bad as the preseason poll was, it's never been more obvious than in the middle part of the season.
Though we're still several weeks away from the release of the first College Football Playoff poll, there's little doubt that the current AP poll is influencing strength of schedule debates. Not to mention potentially informing the selection committee as it deliberates in the coming weeks. And as usual, some of the most extreme outliers in the latest iteration of the AP Poll have benefited the SEC. Whether through over-ranking some teams, because of their conference affiliation, or by not ranking other teams that might deserve it. The published rankings are also exposing how many voters are either not watching games, or not updating their views based on week-to-week results.
Particularly with teams like the LSU Tigers, Washington Huskies and the USC Trojans. And these rankings are already being used to advance arguments that aren't actually supported.
The LSU Tigers enter the week ranked No. 10, just one spot behind their preseason ranking. Sounds reasonable, until you look at how the Tigers got there. They opened the season by beating the Clemson Tigers on the road, which at the time looked like a meaningful win over a top-5 opponent. But Clemson has fallen off a cliff, starting 3-3 with losses to Georgia Tech and Syracuse. As is so often the case however, poll voters never updated their rankings to adjust LSU down because Clemson isn't a top-5 team. Their other "big" win came over the Florida Gators. While Florida's not a bottom-tier team by any means, they're 2-4, including a loss to USF. The other difficult game LSU played? They lost. They're still No. 10, a standard that would never be applied were they not part of the SEC. And we know this to be the case, because we can compare them to other teams.
USC, for example, has one loss. On the road, to a team ranked No. 17 at the time. That team, Illinois, has two losses. Those two losses are to the best two teams in college football, Ohio State and Indiana. USC has a dominant win over Michigan on its resume. But because USC started lower than LSU in the preseason, and doesn't get the perceived benefit of the SEC's "quality loss" formula, they sit 10 spots behind the Tigers at No. 20.
What and how you value can change your perception of rankings. But even looking at objective data, based on opponent-adjusted efficiency, the SEC is being given undue credit because of its brand names. ESPN's Bill Connelly, creator of the SP+ metric, posted that ranking's list of teams based on their actual performance this season, with preseason expectations removed.
Lo and behold, four of the top-5 teams are in the Big 10. And the best team thus far? The Texas Tech Red Raiders. LSU? They're No. 22. Georgia? No 21. Alabama? No. 26.
Again, these are opponent adjusted. It already includes the strength of the opponent. Notice too, that the Washington Huskies are #12, 10 spots higher than LSU in on-field performance. Yet they're unranked in the AP Poll, while the Tigers are #10. What does this mean? It means, as always, that the SEC boosters are using AP Poll rankings to talk up their strength of schedule and the supposed difficulty of the SEC gauntlet.
Does the objective data mean that the SEC is a cakewalk and none of the conference's teams are deserving of being ranked highly? Of course not. It does, however, show that SEC teams are added to the AP Poll when they don't necessarily deserve it. But the talking points are out; the SEC has the hardest remaining schedule because of AP ranked teams. Except, once again, looking at data-driven rankings, remaining strength of schedule is remarkably similar between conferences. Six of the 11 hardest remaining schedules are in the Big Ten, per ESPN's FPI metric. The other five are in the SEC. Nine of the top 18 toughest remaining schedules are in the Big Ten. 10 of the top 18 are in the SEC. It's very evenly matched. Yet it won't be presented that way, because of biased human voters that don't watch the games.
As one quick example, an AP voter had Michigan No. 17 and USC unranked in this week's poll. Even though USC just beat Michigan, handily, at the Coliseum on Saturday. Why? Because they likely didn't watch the game and forgot to update it before Sunday morning's deadline. With an expanded playoff, this matters more than ever. And it's in the hands of people who aren't even paying attention.
Re: NCAA football 2025
There’s a buzz in Gainesville that either James Franklin or Lane Kiffin will be the Gators new coach next year.
stay tuned
Dark Horse: Michigan State
stay tuned
Dark Horse: Michigan State
Re: NCAA football 2025
good article @Kress ...thanks for sharing
I agree that voters should completely reassess every week instead of simply adjusting week to week standings which it seems most of them do.
though the voters don't do good at that, I actually think the Committee does a good job in that regards.
All that being said, I don't think SP+ is very good (whether it is the one that includes preseason expectations or doesn't).
I agree that voters should completely reassess every week instead of simply adjusting week to week standings which it seems most of them do.
though the voters don't do good at that, I actually think the Committee does a good job in that regards.
All that being said, I don't think SP+ is very good (whether it is the one that includes preseason expectations or doesn't).
Re: NCAA football 2025
Zarni wrote: ↑Wed Oct 15, 2025 2:04 pm good article @Kress ...thanks for sharing
I agree that voters should completely reassess every week instead of simply adjusting week to week standings which it seems most of them do.
though the voters don't do good at that, I actually think the Committee does a good job in that regards.
All that being said, I don't think SP+ is very good (whether it is the one that includes preseason expectations or doesn't).
You don't know how many times I've had that conversation with my wife. It will be like the first or second week of the season, when nobody knows anything about anyone, and X team will be ranked 15 and beat a 2, while Y team will be 8 and beat a 5. In the next rankings, Y will stay way far ahead of X, and my only excuse to her for that is: "it's just harder to jump up that many spaces." "Why?" "It just is because it is and that's how it is."
Re: NCAA football 2025
Lol. that's awesome. One of those instances where guys, the supposed rational ones, have no explanation whatsoever.Kress wrote: ↑Wed Oct 15, 2025 2:13 pmZarni wrote: ↑Wed Oct 15, 2025 2:04 pm good article @Kress ...thanks for sharing
I agree that voters should completely reassess every week instead of simply adjusting week to week standings which it seems most of them do.
though the voters don't do good at that, I actually think the Committee does a good job in that regards.
All that being said, I don't think SP+ is very good (whether it is the one that includes preseason expectations or doesn't).
You don't know how many times I've had that conversation with my wife. It will be like the first or second week of the season, when nobody knows anything about anyone, and X team will be ranked 15 and beat a 2, while Y team will be 8 and beat a 5. In the next rankings, Y will stay way far ahead of X, and my only excuse to her for that is: "it's just harder to jump up that many spaces." "Why?" "It just is because it is and that's how it is."
Re: NCAA football 2025
My brother is one of boosters.
Florida head coach Billy Napier could be fired as “soon as this weekend,” per USA TODAY Sports.
According to sources, Florida’s athletic director Scott Stricklin met with a handful of influential boosters on Tuesday and was told continuing financial support depends on a “new direction within the football program.”
Re: NCAA football 2025
Zarni wrote: ↑Wed Oct 15, 2025 2:15 pmLol. that's awesome. One of those instances where guys, the supposed rational ones, have no explanation whatsoever.Kress wrote: ↑Wed Oct 15, 2025 2:13 pm
You don't know how many times I've had that conversation with my wife. It will be like the first or second week of the season, when nobody knows anything about anyone, and X team will be ranked 15 and beat a 2, while Y team will be 8 and beat a 5. In the next rankings, Y will stay way far ahead of X, and my only excuse to her for that is: "it's just harder to jump up that many spaces." "Why?" "It just is because it is and that's how it is."
I did have an explanation, because I explained it to her, so the explanation shows there was an explanation otherwise I could not have explained what I so obviously did explain to her using my explanation.
Oddly, she hasn't divorced me yet.
Re: NCAA football 2025
My brother said that Napier’s fired, regardless of the outcome this weekend’s.
Re: NCAA football 2025
Can anyone tell me what they think about Red Murdock LB Buffalo?
Re: NCAA football 2025
Listen Johnny come lately my family is from Canton/Akron. My brain won't hold all the stories from them growing up in that area.
Now go have one of the alt boys study Red.
Re: NCAA football 2025
I don’t know what that really means, but I like it!!
Re: NCAA football 2025
How can one tell you're not a Hillbilly or, if not a Hillbilly, you didn't at least come from a Hillbilly family. You spell reckon, recon. {sigh}

Don't tread on me
Re: NCAA football 2025
My family couldn't afford k. No K-Mart, no Special K, none of it.
Re: NCAA football 2025
To be fair, there are other ways to tell one isn't a Hillbilly. They have all their teeth. They wear shoes outside. They bathe more than once a week. Just little things, to be sure.
Last edited by Buc2 on Fri Oct 17, 2025 8:14 am, edited 1 time in total.

Don't tread on me
Re: NCAA football 2025
What the fuck?
Memphis vs USF
https://gotigersgo.com/news/2025/10/13/ ... -11am-kick
The biggest game is set for 11 in the morning. They might face each other again for the conference championship game.
12 pm eastern time?!!?
Memphis vs USF
https://gotigersgo.com/news/2025/10/13/ ... -11am-kick
The biggest game is set for 11 in the morning. They might face each other again for the conference championship game.
12 pm eastern time?!!?
Re: NCAA football 2025
Penn State wants Matt Rhule and Ryan Day.per sources
Florida: Lane Kiffin, James Franklin
Michigan State: James Franklin
Stay tuned
Florida: Lane Kiffin, James Franklin
Michigan State: James Franklin
Stay tuned


