Tampa Bay Buccaneers @ Detroit Lions Official Game Day Thread: Divisional Round Edition

[Bootz]

Put Devin White in the game

[Bootz]

Why are we going for 2?

[Doctor]

I mean its not over….

If we've learned anything from Baker and this team is that they have no quit.

[Heisenberg]

Wtfff

[Cheb]

Going for 2? Huh.

[13F11B]

That was DPI on the 2-pt try.

[Heisenberg]

Why

[Doctor]

Analytics. I like it.

[Central_Buc]

WTF kick the xp

[Cheb]

No flag? Double huh.

[13F11B]

I would not have gone for two. I think that is analytically correct, but fucking stupid.

[Navybuc]

wtf Bowles? You idiot.

[GreatTimes]

Don't like that call and that throw by Baker on the 2. Throw high for Evans!

[Doctor]

No DPI on that push back? Smh

[acmillis]

So dumb to go for two…so sooo dumb

[Bootz]

I would not have gone for two. I think that is analytically correct, but fucking stupid.

But why is that analytically correct??

[CantonJester]

That was a terrible pass by Mayfield. It's not necessarily PI if the ball is hitting the defender in his back.

[Sdbucs]

How is that not a flag

[Navybuc]

Analytics. I like it.

I don’t. It’s stupid. That’s something you do week 3 of the regular season. Not the playoffs. Idiotic call.

[Doooshnzl]

I am not looking forward to more Bowles and Baker next year.

Better get used to it.

[BucsNBills]

Decision to go for 2 is debatable.

That missed dpi call is not.

[TonyLip]

Logic was there for 2 then and possible turnover and quick TD strike

[GreatTimes]

That was DPI on the 2-pt try.

No, It was underthrown by Baker and hit the DB in the back, DB never made contact with Evans.

[CantonJester]

I would not have gone for two. I think that is analytically correct, but fucking stupid.

But why is that analytically correct??

It presents the better chance to win the game in regulation, not reach OT.

[Miller4Prez64]

Ngl, I would be shocked if the defende gets the ball back to the offense.

[Doctor]

A FG still leaves you tying with another 7pt score. This gives you win and tying options. If there's any analytics play that has stood the test is 2pt when down 2 scores.

[Buc2]

How is that not a flag

#itsabucslife

[TonyLip]

Love ya Bucs!!
Bring back Baker!!!

[Phantom]

I am not looking forward to more Bowles and Baker next year.

Better get used to it.

Never know. Jim Harbaugh is still available

[Buccabeer]

That sums up our season. Stupid play call by Bowels and Baker being a half good QB

[Noles1724]

Neal is going to be needed, Neal is going to fail

[13F11B]

I would not have gone for two. I think that is analytically correct, but fucking stupid.

But why is that analytically correct??

Statistically, if you get the two your chance of winning the game is higher than if you go for one. On the flip side if you fail you just made it more difficult to tie.

[Bootz]

But why is that analytically correct??

It presents the better chance to win the game in regulation, not reach OT.

WHAT?!?! That's the biggest piece of BS I've ever heard. Analytics can fuck off

[Rocker]

I disliked the call before, during, and after.

Pat Sajack concurs.

[Phantom]

But why is that analytically correct??

It presents the better chance to win the game in regulation, not reach OT.

This is playoff.